RAD 150 vs RAD 140 Explained: Potency, Effects, and the Best Option

RAD-140, also known as Testolone, and RAD-150 belong to SARMS. They both have shown promising benefits in research trials with fewer adverse effects. These promising benefits may include patterns linked with lean muscle mass, skeletal health, strength, and energy in research models. Besides, these SARMS may also be different from each other and may pose some safety concerns. 

In this blog, we will discuss all the details about these SARMS, their similarities and differences, safety concerns, and the best option. Keep reading to the end!

What is RAD 140?

Buy RAD 140

RAD 140, also known as Testolone, belongs to the category of SARMS. SARMS stand for Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators. Initially, RAD-140 was developed to influence the patterns linked with muscle wasting (cachexia) and osteoporosis (the weakening of bones due to age) in research models. However, subsequent preclinical research has also found it beneficial for affecting research subjects’ endurance, strength, and energy. 

The investigations have found that these potential roles may be carried out by binding to androgen receptors in test models’ muscle and bone tissues. This selective binding restricts the influence of RAD 140 to its targeted place in clinical trials. 

What is RAD 150?

Buy RAD 150

RAD 150 is the modified version of RAD-140. The ester chain is added to develop RAD-150 in research investigations. This extra addition may extend its half-life, efficacy, and stability during clinical trials. Preclinical investigations of RAD 150 on animals have found its potential to exhibit anabolic activities in research models. These anabolic activities may include influencing the patterns associated with muscle growth, bone strength, fat loss, and metabolic rate in test subjects. 

Furthermore, its working mechanism is similar to that of its parent compound RAD-140. Studies have suggested that it may selectively bind to androgen receptors in muscle and bone tissues to display its potential benefits. This selective binding also differentiates it from traditional steroids, which influence other areas in research subjects besides their targeted areas. 

Key Similarities Between RAD 150 and RAD 140

The following are the similarities of RAD 140 and RAD 150: 

• Muscle Growth

Research studies have suggested that these SARMS may benefit the muscle growth of research models during clinical trials. This muscle growth may occur when they influence the patterns associated with the effects of testosterone and exhibit anabolic activities. This may provide proteins and reduce muscle wasting, leading to muscle growth and lean muscle mass in research subjects. 

• Bone Strength/Skeletal Health

In preclinical trials, it has also been found that these SARMS may also benefit bone strength in research subjects. The bone strength may occur when these SARMS (RAD 140 and RAD 150) potentially bind with androgen receptors in the bone tissues of subjects. After binding, they may influence the patterns linked with skeletal health and display anabolic activities. This may lead to an improvement in skeletal health in subjects. 

• Fat Loss

Fat loss is another potential benefit of these SARMS. Fat loss may occur in two ways during clinical trials: first, improved muscle growth may require more energy for proper functioning, which may be consumed from stored fats. Second, these SARMS may increase lipolysis, which is the breakdown of large fatty acid molecules into smaller ones. These two roles may accelerate fat loss in subjects in clinical trials.   

• Fast Metabolism

Research investigations have also found that these SARMS may speed up the metabolic rate of research subjects. The fast metabolic rate may affect test models’ energy and endurance levels. This may also enhance energy availability, increase strength and stamina, and reduce fat in research participants in clinical trials. 

Key Differences Between RAD 150 and RAD 140

Despite being similar to each other, they also possess some key differences. These differences are explained below: 

• Chemical Structure

RAD 150’s chemical structure contains an extra ester chain, which differentiates it from its parent compound, RAD 140. It is considered a modified version of RAD 140. 

• Half-Life

Clinical trials on animals suggest that the half-life of RAD 150 may be longer in research studies than that of RAD 140. This half-life was found to result from the addition of an ester chain. 

• Absorption Rate

In preclinical research, the absorption rate of RAD 140 was higher than that of RAD 150. This higher rate may absorb the RAD 140 more quickly, and thus its influence may easily be eliminated from research models in trials. 

• Potential Benefits

Research studies found that RAD-150’s potential benefits may be sustained and present for a more extended period in research subjects than RAD-140. 

Which Option is Better? 

More research has been conducted on RAD140 compared to RAD-150. Further, the results of RAD 140 are more predictable during trials. Therefore, researchers use RAD-140 for investigation. RAD-140 has also been shown to have potential for muscle growth and bone strength in subjects during investigations. Hence, RAD-140 may be the best choice for influencing muscles and bones. Moreover, selecting either SARM depends on researchers’ goals, objectives, and requirements. 

Price Comparison

Here is an overview of the price comparison of RAD-140 and RAD-150 SARMS:

SARM	RAD-140	RAD-150
Price	$29.84 – $168.31	$35.50 – $161.63

Legal Status

Regarding their legality, they are not FDA and WADA-approved. They are legal for use in controlled and licensed research environments only. Human consumption is strictly prohibited. 

Safety Concerns

These SARMS are safe in preclinical research on animals. During clinical trials, there were no severe or dark side effects. Only a few mild side effects were observed while investigating these compounds. However, researchers effectively handled these concerns. 

Final Thought

RAD-140 and RAD-150 are SARMS. They have the potential to bind with androgen receptors in the muscle and bone tissues of research models in a clinical trial. They have similar potential benefits, like muscle growth, skeletal health, fat loss, and accelerated metabolic rate. Conversely, they are also different in chemical structure, half-life, and absorption rate in research subjects. Coming towards the best option, researchers recommend RAD-140 for investigations, as it is safer and secure with fewer adverse effects. 

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQS)

Will RAD-140 show on a drug test in research subjects? 

Research studies have found that RAD-140, Testolone, may appear on a drug test in clinical trials. 

What is the best place to buy RAD-140 (testolone) and RAD-150 online? 

The best place to buy RAD-140 and RAD-150 online is BehemothLabz. We offer these SARMs after getting them approved by an independent laboratory. Furthermore, our products are of the highest quality and are ready to deliver optimal results in research trials. Similarly, our prices are very reasonable, and the products can be delivered nationally and internationally. 

What does RAD-140 (testolone) do to the research models? 

RAD-140 or Testolone may influence the patterns associated with muscle growth, skeletal health, and fat loss in research models. These potential roles may be carried out without impacting other parts of the subjects. 

Does RAD-150 raise testosterone in test subjects? 

No, there are no clues found in clinical trials regarding the raising of testosterone levels in research subjects. It may only mimic the effects of testosterone and thus exhibit anabolic activities in subjects during trials. 

References: 

1. ROSS, SVANTE B., and S. BENGT A. ÅKERMAN. “Cyclization of Three N-ω-Haloalkyl-N-Methylaminoaceto-2, 6-Xylidide Derivatives in Relation to Their Local Anesthetic Effect In Vitro and In Vivo.” The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 182.2 (1972): 351-361.
2. Kumar, Ankur. “RAD 150 SARM Reviews: Side Effects, Cycling, Dosage & Results.”
3. Koert, Willem, et al. “SARMs: an emergent health problem in fitness and bodybuilding.” TSG-Tijdschrift voor gezondheidswetenschappen 99 (2021): 161-164.
4. Koert, Willem, et al. “SARMs: een nieuw gezondheidsprobleem in fitness en bodybuilding.” TSG; Tijdschrift voor gezondheiswetenschappen 99.4 (2021): 161-164.